A pattern of pre-emptive leaks of draft opinions would destroy the Court. On the most crucial point-the substance of the law and Constitution-Justice Alito’s opinion is carefully argued and comprehensive. It grapples directly with the constitutional issues that the Court ignored in Roe and dodged in Planned Parenthood v. The Court “simply asserted the result it reached,” as Yale scholar It quotes from the many liberal authorities who criticized the Court’s legal invention. The opinion deals exhaustively with the issue of when the Court should overturn a precedent, and why it is justified in this case. It also makes clear that Roe is sui generis, and overturning it does not signal a threat to other precedents, such as Griswold on contraception. Expect to hear about a parade of fanciful legal horribles in the coming days.Īs we wrote last week, overturning Roe will not be the end of abortion in America. Libtards destroyed Comment by Diabolical Girlfriend If it is overturned, some states will restrict or ban abortion rights while others may make it easier.īut this profound moral question will be debated and settled the way it should be in a democracy-by the people.Wait so I acually need to ru- Comment by some_one It would merely return the matter to the states, where abortion law was liberalizing in 1973 before the Court usurped that political and moral debate. Should've added "1 *EERRGGH*" as the audio was fading out but right before the audio cut off.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |